From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vercruysse v. Alati

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1980
78 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

November 13, 1980

Appeal from the Monroe Supreme Court.

Present — Simons, J.P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The exclusive remedy provisions of subdivision 6 of section 29 of the Workers' Compensation Law do not bar an employee who has accepted workers' compensation benefits from bringing a common-law cause of action against a coemployee who has committed an intentional assault upon him (Maines v Cronomer Val. Fire Dept., 50 N.Y.2d 535; Mazarredo v Levine, 274 App. Div. 122; cf. Smith v State of New York, 72 A.D.2d 937).


Summaries of

Vercruysse v. Alati

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1980
78 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

Vercruysse v. Alati

Case Details

Full title:ROGER VERCRUYSSE, Respondent, v. LOUIS ALATI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1980

Citations

78 A.D.2d 1015 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

Werner v. State

Claimant, having filed for workers' compensation benefits, and having received, accepted and retained such…

Werner v. State of New York

" While it is clear that subdivision 6 of section 29 of the Workers' Compensation Law does not bar an…