From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vera v. Kombazdjian

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 18, 2022
CV 22-02609-AB (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-02609-AB (RAOx)

08-18-2022

Ignacio Vera v. Hagob Kombazdjian et al


Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Linkv. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 1, 2022 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

[ ] Defendant(s) did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Vera v. Kombazdjian

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 18, 2022
CV 22-02609-AB (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Vera v. Kombazdjian

Case Details

Full title:Ignacio Vera v. Hagob Kombazdjian et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 18, 2022

Citations

CV 22-02609-AB (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2022)