Ventura County v. Barry

1 Citing case

  1. Lagoon Jockey Club v. Davis County

    72 Utah 405 (Utah 1928)   Cited 8 times

    That too is uncontrovertible. The following authorities relied on by respondents are cited on various propositions: Racing Commission v. Latonia Association, 136 Ky. 173, 123 S.W. 681, 25 L.R.A. (N.S.) 905; State v. Carmen, 44 Utah 353, 140 P. 670; Nettles v. Carson, 77 Okla. 219, 187 P. 799; State v. Penrod, 102 Neb. 734, 169 N.W. 266; Wood v. Bateman, 149 La. 290, 88 So. 824; 25 R.C.L. 930, 941, 1087; Schuyler v. Southern Pac. Ry., Co., 37 Utah 581, 109 P. 458; U.S. v. Yuginni et al. (D.C.) 266 F. 746; U.S. v. Puhac (D.C.) 268 F. 392; Bank of N.Y. v. Tilton, 82 N.H. 81, 129 A. 492; State v. Board of Commissioners, 22 Nev. 203, 37 P. 487; Marioneaux v. Cutler, 32 Utah 475, 91 P. 355, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 1088; Ventura County v. Barry (Cal.App.) 259 P. 764. Respondents also make frequent reference to certain remarks made by the writer of this opinion, speaking for the court, in State Fair Association v. Green et al. (Utah) 249 P. 1016, in which the Redd Act, while it was in force, 6 came under review.