From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ventimiglia v. Ventimiglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 2003
307 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03016

Submitted June 13, 2003.

August 18, 2003.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief and by letter dated June 2, 2003, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Berkowitz, J.), dated March 21, 2002, as granted the plaintiff's motion to increase monthly maintenance by the nontaxable sum of $6,500.

Alexander Potruch, LLC, Mineola, N.Y., for appellant.

Koopersmith Brown, LLP, Lake Success, N.Y. (Amy Lesserson Brown of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA L. TOWNES, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of an amended judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal and cross appeal from the amended judgment ( see CPLR 5501[a][1]; Ventimiglia v. Ventimiglia, 307 A.D.2d 993 [Appellate Division Docket No. 2002-04462, decided herewith]).

SANTUCCI, J.P., McGINITY, TOWNES and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ventimiglia v. Ventimiglia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 18, 2003
307 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Ventimiglia v. Ventimiglia

Case Details

Full title:LAURIE JEAN VENTIMIGLIA, respondent, v. BRUCE E. VENTIMIGLIA, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 18, 2003

Citations

307 A.D.2d 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
763 N.Y.S.2d 487