Submitted August 7, 1995
Decided October 24, 1995
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Cross motion for incidental relief denied.
Full title:KATHERINE VENIZELOS, Respondent, v. NIKITIS VENIZELOS, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 24, 1995
j) Any other relevant fact indicating that a judgment of conviction would serve no useful purpose.C.P.L.§…
Althoff v. Scott Brannon M.D., Cape Radiology Grp., P.C.This Court agrees with Burns' reasoning. As explained in Steinberg v. Dunseth, "[t]he section 2-622 report is…