Veneris v. Dep't of Army

Full title: MARK VENERIS, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 11, 2020

2020-1447 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2020)

Opinion

2020-1447

12-11-2020

MARK VENERIS, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent

CHERI L. CANNON, Tully Rinckey PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by MICHAEL WILSON MACOMBER, Albany, NY. ROBERT R. KIEPURA, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by JEFFREY B. CLARK, CLAUDIA BURKE, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DC-4324-19-0707-I-1.

JUDGMENT

CHERI L. CANNON, Tully Rinckey PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by MICHAEL WILSON MACOMBER, Albany, NY. ROBERT R. KIEPURA, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by JEFFREY B. CLARK, CLAUDIA BURKE, ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 11, 2020

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court