Vener v. Mro Corp.

Full title: JOHN VENER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MRO CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent.

Court: SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 8, 2016

DOCKET NO. A-5501-13T1 (App. Div. Apr. 8, 2016)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. A-5501-13T1

04-08-2016

JOHN VENER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MRO CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent.

Sander D. Friedman argued the cause for appellant (Law Office of Sander D. Friedman, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Friedman and Wesley G. Hanna, on the briefs). Lisa J. Rodriguez argued the cause for respondent (Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, attorneys; David Smith and Rebecca Lacher, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION Before Judges Ostrer, Haas and Manahan. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Camden County, Docket No. L-859-14. Sander D. Friedman argued the cause for appellant (Law Office of Sander D. Friedman, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Friedman and Wesley G. Hanna, on the briefs). Lisa J. Rodriguez argued the cause for respondent (Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, attorneys; David Smith and Rebecca Lacher, on the brief). PER CURIAM

This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties having stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the original on file in my office.

CLERK OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION