From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velazquez v. Metropolitan Dade Cty

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 13, 1983
442 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-1140.

December 13, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Lewis B. Whitworth, Jr., J.

Stabinski Funt and Norman Funt, Miami, for appellant.

Talburt, Kubicki Bradley, and Gail Leverett Kniskern, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


We reject the plaintiff's challenge to section 95.11(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981), as an unconstitutional denial of access to the courts. Our supreme court has responded to the issues raised herein when it decided Slaughter v. Tyler, 126 Fla. 515, 171 So. 320 (1936), overruled on other grounds, Manning v. Serrano, 97 So.2d 688 (Fla. 1957); accord Gasparro v. Horner, 245 So.2d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971). Since the emancipated minor in the present case had access to the courts through his natural parents, the statute of limitations was not tolled during his minority.

Consequently, the order dismissing the complaint is affirmed.


Summaries of

Velazquez v. Metropolitan Dade Cty

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 13, 1983
442 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Velazquez v. Metropolitan Dade Cty

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS VELAZQUEZ, APPELLANT, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 13, 1983

Citations

442 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Drake v. Island Community Church

Slaughter is therefore inapplicable. For the same reasons, the defendant-church's reliance on Velazquez v.…

Lindabury v. Lindabury

Thus, under any conventional application of the statute of limitations, the appellant's cause of action…