From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vela v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 7, 1981
396 So. 2d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 77-1860.

April 7, 1981.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Ellen Morphonios Gable, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and (Beth C. Weitzner, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


We reverse appellant's second-degree murder conviction on the ground that both the pattern and content of the prosecutor's questioning, as well as portions of her closing argument, impermissibly prejudiced appellant's right to a fair trial. Peterson v. State, 376 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 386 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1980); Sims v. State, 371 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Porter v. State, 347 So.2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), after remand, 386 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Our ruling makes it unnecessary to consider the other grounds for reversal raised by appellant.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Summaries of

Vela v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Apr 7, 1981
396 So. 2d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Vela v. State

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL VELA, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Apr 7, 1981

Citations

396 So. 2d 267 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Gonzalez v. State

In the interests of justice, we think a new trial is absolutely required. See Jenkins v. State, 563 So.2d 791…