From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VEIL v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

United States District Court, S.D. California
Mar 3, 2009
CASE NO. 09 CV 0175 JM (LSP) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO. 09 CV 0175 JM (LSP).

March 3, 2009


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT


Plaintiff Deborah Veil ("Plaintiff") filed her Complaint in this matter on January 29, 2009. Service was made on Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America ("Prudential") on February 5, 2009 with a response to the Complaint then due February 25, 2009. Defendant Long Term Disability Coverage for All Employees of AT T Wireless Services, Inc. Plan #501 ("AT T Plan") has not been served but now waives service of summons as part of the parties' stipulation.

For good cause showing, the court hereby GRANTS the parties' joint motion. (Doc. No. 6.) Prudential shall have a 30-day extension of time in which to respond to the Complaint. Prudential and the AT T Plan shall therefore file and serve responsive pleadings on or before March 27, 2009.


Summaries of

VEIL v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

United States District Court, S.D. California
Mar 3, 2009
CASE NO. 09 CV 0175 JM (LSP) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2009)
Case details for

VEIL v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH VEIL, Plaintiff, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. California

Date published: Mar 3, 2009

Citations

CASE NO. 09 CV 0175 JM (LSP) (S.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2009)