From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veenstra Family Trust v. United Heritage Mutual Life Ins.

United States District Court, D. Idaho
Jul 22, 2002
Case No. CV-00-735-S-BLW (D. Idaho Jul. 22, 2002)

Opinion

Case No. CV-00-735-S-BLW.

July 22, 2002


ORDER


The Court has before it a Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge. (Docket No. 75.) Neither the plaintiff nor the defendants have filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, has found the conclusions therein to be well reasoned and supported by relevant legal precedent, and will therefore adopt the Report and Recommendation as its own. Accordingly,

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 75) shall be, and the same is hereby, ADOPTED as the decision of the District Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Defendant Gene Schiffler (Docket No. 53) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute in the Name of the Real Party in Interest (Docket No. 58) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Veenstra Family Trust v. United Heritage Mutual Life Ins.

United States District Court, D. Idaho
Jul 22, 2002
Case No. CV-00-735-S-BLW (D. Idaho Jul. 22, 2002)
Case details for

Veenstra Family Trust v. United Heritage Mutual Life Ins.

Case Details

Full title:VEENSTRA FAMILY TRUST, Plaintiff, v. UNITED HERITAGE MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Idaho

Date published: Jul 22, 2002

Citations

Case No. CV-00-735-S-BLW (D. Idaho Jul. 22, 2002)