From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veasey v. Cal. State Univ. Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-02601 TLN AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-02601 TLN AC (PS)

10-31-2018

LAMAR VEASEY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO and DR. ERNIE HILLS, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and the action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial proceedings by E.D. Cal. R. ("Local Rule") 302(c)(21). Plaintiff previously requested and was granted authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). ECF Nos. 2 and 3. Plaintiff's initial complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is now before the court. ECF No. 4.

I. SCREENING

The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally "frivolous or malicious," fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The court finds that, for screening purposes only, plaintiff's claims as presented in the First Amended Complaint are sufficiently cognizable.

II. CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

? California State University Sacramento

? Dr. Ernie Hills

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue forthwith, and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve within ninety days of the date of this order, all process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, without prepayment of costs.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff the above: one USM-285, one summons, a copy of the complaint, and an appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge.

4. Plaintiff is directed to supply the U.S. Marshal, within 15 days from the date this order is filed, all information needed by the Marshal to effect service of process, and shall promptly file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The court anticipates that, to effect service, the U.S. Marshal will require, for each defendant in ¶ 3, above, at least:

a. One completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form;

c. One copy of the endorsed filed complaint, with an extra copy for the U.S. Marshal;

d. One copy of the instant order; and

e. An appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge.

5. In the event the U.S. Marshal is unable, for any reason whatsoever, to effect service on any defendant within 90 days from the date of this order, the Marshal is directed to report that fact, and the reasons for it, to the undersigned.

6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal, 501 "I" Street, Sacramento, Ca., 95814, Tel. No. (916) 930-2030. //// ////

7. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 31, 2018

/s/_________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Plaintiff has submitted the following documents to the U.S. Marshal, in compliance with the court's order filed __________:

___ completed summons form

___ completed USM-285 form

___ copy of the complaint

___ completed form to consent or decline to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction __________
Date

/s/_________

Plaintiff's Signature


Summaries of

Veasey v. Cal. State Univ. Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 31, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-02601 TLN AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2018)
Case details for

Veasey v. Cal. State Univ. Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:LAMAR VEASEY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SACRAMENTO and DR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-02601 TLN AC (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2018)