From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vazquez v. Vera

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Mar 31, 2022
3:21-cv-00127 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00127

03-31-2022

JUAN VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. ANTONIO VERA and VERA INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Defendants.


ORDER

WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

No objections have been filed to Magistrate Judge Holmes' Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 29) that this action be dismissed because no motion for substitution was filed after the death of Antonio Vera on October 15, 2021. Having reviewed the matter de novo as required by Rule 72, the Court agrees with the recommended disposition because (1) the language of Rule 25(a)(1) is clear; (2) the decedent of Mr. Vera “was given multiple notice of the requirement of a motion for substitution, ” (Doc. No. 29 at 2-3), but no motion was filed by any party; and (3) Mr. Vera was sued individually and was “the sole owner and member of the defendant Vera Interior Construction, LLC” (Doc. No. 22).

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 29) is ACCEPTED and APPROVED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED.

The Clerk of the Court shall enter a final judgment and close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vazquez v. Vera

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Mar 31, 2022
3:21-cv-00127 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Vazquez v. Vera

Case Details

Full title:JUAN VAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. ANTONIO VERA and VERA INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

3:21-cv-00127 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 31, 2022)