From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Werley

Supreme Court of California
Nov 23, 1882
62 Cal. 181 (Cal. 1882)

Opinion

         Department One

         Motion to dismiss appeal.

         COUNSEL

          Hale & Craig, for Appellant.

          J. M. Fulweiler, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         The Court:

         No transcript on appeal has been filed. The certificate of the Clerk below is on file, showing the matters required by Rule 4 of this Court. The appeal is dismissed.

         We are asked to affix damages. The statute authorizes damages on affirmance of the judgment, if it appear that the appeal was taken for delay. In the absence of the transcript we have nothing from which to determine that the appeal was taken for delay. Application for damages denied


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Werley

Supreme Court of California
Nov 23, 1882
62 Cal. 181 (Cal. 1882)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Werley

Case Details

Full title:VAUGHN v. WERLEY

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 23, 1882

Citations

62 Cal. 181 (Cal. 1882)

Citing Cases

Barnett v. County of Contra Costa

The plaintiff has her action against the supervisors. (Pol. Code, § 4086; Santa Cruz R. R. Co. v. Santa Cruz …