From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. Ward

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 6, 2021
19 CIVIL 6596 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2021)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 6596 (RA)

04-06-2021

GERALD VAUGHN, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH WARD, Superintendent, Marcy Correctional Facility, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated April 6, 2021, Judge Fox stated that any objections would be due within 24 days of service of the Report, adding an extra ten days to account for "any delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic." Dkt. 19 at 10. As no objections to the Report were filed within that period, the Court has reviewed Judge Fox's Report for clear error, and found none. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed without prejudice. Because the petition makes no substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), and this case is closed. DATED: New York, New York

April 6, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Vaughn v. Ward

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 6, 2021
19 CIVIL 6596 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Vaughn v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:GERALD VAUGHN, Petitioner, v. JOSEPH WARD, Superintendent, Marcy…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 6, 2021

Citations

19 CIVIL 6596 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2021)