From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 18, 1967
198 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Opinion

No. I-196.

May 18, 1967.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Duval County, A. Lloyd Layton, J.

Mahon Mahon, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., and Wallace E. Allbritton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellant was found guilty of the charge of conspiracy to violate Section 562.23, Florida Statutes, F.S.A. The evidence supports the verdict. The question here is as to the sufficiency of the court's instruction to the jury as to the elements of the crime of conspiracy. The court instructed the jury in substance that in order to convict of conspiracy, the defendant must have actively and intentionally participated in the "furtherance" of the conspiracy or common design as a whole. Appellant having furnished money for gas for cooking the mash and having furnished sugar and money for sugar was sufficient to show that appellant knowingly and actively participated in the furtherance of the conspiracy. Use of the word "furtherance" of the conspiracy is practically synonymous with the words of the statute "to effect the object of the conspiracy."

Finding no error in the instructions, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C.J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vaughn v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 18, 1967
198 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
Case details for

Vaughn v. State

Case Details

Full title:CURTISS CLARENDON VAUGHN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 18, 1967

Citations

198 So. 2d 858 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)

Citing Cases

Hanson v. State

Accordingly, having reviewed the record, listening to arguments of counsel, and applying the applicable…