Opinion
Nos. 05-08-01316-CR, 05-08-01317-CR
Opinion Filed July 28, 2011. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F03-51597-JU, F05-00010-IU.
Before Justices RICHTER, LANG, and FILLMORE.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant waived a jury and pleaded guilty to possession with intent to deliver cocaine and attempted capital murder. After finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at fifteen years' imprisonment and a $1,000 fine for the drug conviction and twenty years' imprisonment and a $1,000 fine for the attempted capital murder conviction. On appeal, appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (court of appeals's duty is to determine whether there are any arguable issues, and, if so, to remand the case to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to address those issues). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals. We affirm the trial court's judgments.