From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaughan v. Siren Steel

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Apr 10, 2008
No. 01-07-00275-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2008)

Opinion

No. 01-07-00275-CV

Opinion issued April 10, 2008.

On Appeal from the 113 th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 2006-43991.

Panel consists of Justices TAFT, KEYES, and ALCALA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


We received communication from the mediator on October 23, 2007, stating that the parties had settled. Because no motion to dismiss was filed, on February 19, 2008, the Court issued a notice warning that unless, within 15 days of the date of the notice, the parties to the appeal demonstrate that there was a live controversy between them as to the merits of this appeal, the appeal would be dismissed. See Hallmark Personnel of Texas, Inc. v. Franks, 562 S.W.2d 933, 935 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1978, no writ) (existence of actual controversy is essential to exercise of appellate jurisdiction). Appellant has filed no response.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),(c).


Summaries of

Vaughan v. Siren Steel

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Apr 10, 2008
No. 01-07-00275-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2008)
Case details for

Vaughan v. Siren Steel

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY VAUGHAN D/B/A BOTANICAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN, Appellant v. SIREN STEEL…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Apr 10, 2008

Citations

No. 01-07-00275-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2008)