From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. Timmerman-Cooper

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 17, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-00935 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-cv-00935.

February 17, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner Fidel Angel Vasquez, a prisoner at the London Correctional Institution, brought this action for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's October 23, 2009 Report and Recommendation that the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed because it was not filed within one year of petitioner's conviction becoming final as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A).

No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. As explained in the Report and Recommendation, petitioner's conviction became final ninety days after December 29, 2004, the date the Supreme Court of Ohio denied his motion for leave to appeal from the Court of Appeals' decision affirming the judgment of conviction. He had one year from that date to file a federal habeas corpus petition. He did not file this petition until October 2009, more than four years after his conviction became final. Upon de novo review as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. This action is hereby DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT dismissing the petition as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A).


Summaries of

Vasquez v. Timmerman-Cooper

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 17, 2010
Case No. 2:09-cv-00935 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Vasquez v. Timmerman-Cooper

Case Details

Full title:Fidel Angel Vasquez, Petitioner v. Debrah Timmerman-Cooper, Warden…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 17, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:09-cv-00935 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 17, 2010)