From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. H.K. & Shanghai Banking Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 10, 2020
18 CIVIL 1876 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 1876 (PAE)

08-10-2020

RIGOBERTO VASQUEZ and EVA GARCIA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. HONG KONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION, LTD., a foreign company, and DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated August 10, 2020, the claims against HSBC Hong Kong are dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(2). Given this dismissal, the Court does not consider the arguments made by HSBC Hong Kong in its earlier-filed Rule 12(b)(6) motion; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

August 10, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Vasquez v. H.K. & Shanghai Banking Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 10, 2020
18 CIVIL 1876 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2020)
Case details for

Vasquez v. H.K. & Shanghai Banking Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RIGOBERTO VASQUEZ and EVA GARCIA, on behalf of themselves and all others…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 10, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 1876 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 10, 2020)