Vasquez v. City of New York

1 Citing case

  1. Ballast v. Workforce7 Inc.

    20-cv-3812 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. May. 8, 2023)   Cited 1 times

    See id. Moreover, factual determinations may not be made at this stage of the litigation, nor will the Court consider the substantive merits of Plaintiffs' claims on a motion to amend. Vasquez v. City of N.Y., No. 20-cv-4641 (ER), 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37165, at *6 (S.D.N.Y Mar. 6, 2023) (citing In re Ivan F. Boesky Sec. Litig., 882 F.Supp. 1371, 1379 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)); see also Goldberg v. Roth, No. 99-cv- 11591 (BSJ), 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20932, at *20 (S.D.N.Y Dec. 13, 2001) (“[U]nless a proposed amendment is clearly frivolous or legally insufficient on its face, the substantive merits of a claim or defense should not be considered on a motion to amend.” (citation omitted)).