From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vasquez v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2562 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2562 JAM CKD P

07-16-2013

ROBERT VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed May 24, 2013, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

______________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Vasquez v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 16, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2562 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Vasquez v. California

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT VASQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 16, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2562 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 16, 2013)