From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vargas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 30, 2018
559 S.W.3d 433 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80894

10-30-2018

Dennis L. VARGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, for Appellant. Julia E. Neidhardt, for Respondent.


Susan L. Hogan, Kansas City, for Appellant.

Julia E. Neidhardt, for Respondent.

Before Division Three: Anthony Rex Gabbert, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Alok Ahuja, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dennis Vargas appeals the denial, after evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He complains on appeal that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object and request a mistrial during voir dire when a venireperson made remarks about Vargas being in jail before. He also claims his trial counsel was ineffective in failing to point out errors in his sentencing assessment report. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Vargas v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 30, 2018
559 S.W.3d 433 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Vargas v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dennis L. VARGAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 30, 2018

Citations

559 S.W.3d 433 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)