From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vargas v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO
Jan 4, 2013
No. 1:11-CV-01852-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:11-CV-01852-AWI-SKO

01-04-2013

ROBERTO VARGAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Does 1 to 100, Inclusive, Defendants.

SUSANA ALCALA WOOD City Attorney JAMES F. WILSON Senior Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants STEVEN A. FABBRO Attorney for Plaintiff


JAMES F. WILSON, Senior Deputy City Attorney, SB #107289
SUSANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney, SB#156366
City of Modesto
Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:

DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION


STIPULATION

The parties to the above-entitled action hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. With the court's approval, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate that and agree, in exchange for the waiver of the defendants' right to recover the costs of defense incurred thus far this action before the U.S. District Court, and in order to allow for the return of this action to the Superior Court of Stanislaus County for litigation to its conclusion, the plaintiff agrees to the dismissal of any and all claims in this action brought under Title 42 U.S.C. section 1983 with prejudice, and the dismissal of all state tort claims in this action without prejudice to their further adjudication before the Superior Court of Stanislaus County California.

2. Each side is to bear its own costs in the litigation of the action before the U.S. District Court, including attorney's fees.

3. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

SUSANA ALCALA WOOD

City Attorney

By: ________________

JAMES F. WILSON

Senior Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendants

Respectfully submitted,

By: ________________

STEVEN A. FABBRO

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based upon the foregoing stipulation and agreement of the parties in the above-entitled action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed as follows:

1. All claims advanced by the plaintiff in this action under Title 42 U.S.C. section 1983 are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;

2. All claims advanced by plaintiff in this action under state tort and/or state constitutional theories of recovery are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to their further adjudication before the Superior Court of the State of California in Stanislaus County, California.

3. Each side is to bear its own costs, including attorney's fees, in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Vargas v. City of Modesto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO
Jan 4, 2013
No. 1:11-CV-01852-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Vargas v. City of Modesto

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO VARGAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MODESTO, MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - FRESNO

Date published: Jan 4, 2013

Citations

No. 1:11-CV-01852-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2013)