From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vargas v. Bennington VT Police Department

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Oct 24, 2007
File No. 1:07-CV-84 (D. Vt. Oct. 24, 2007)

Opinion

File No. 1:07-CV-84.

October 24, 2007


ORDER


The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation was filed September 26, 2007. (Paper 11.) After de novo review and absent objection, the Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED, APPROVED and ADOPTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Plaintiff's motion to dismiss complaint (Paper 10) is construed as a notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Paper 5) and the motion to dismiss filed by Vermont Drug Task Force (Paper 9) are DENIED as moot.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vargas v. Bennington VT Police Department

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Oct 24, 2007
File No. 1:07-CV-84 (D. Vt. Oct. 24, 2007)
Case details for

Vargas v. Bennington VT Police Department

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN VARGAS, Plaintiff v. BENNINGTON VT POLICE DEPARTMENT and VERMONT…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Oct 24, 2007

Citations

File No. 1:07-CV-84 (D. Vt. Oct. 24, 2007)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. Goldstein

However, courts generally do not consider "other filings, such as Defendant's motion to dismiss, to serve the…