From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vantrease v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 31, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-00042 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 31, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-00042

10-31-2012

ROCHELLE J. VANTREASE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge Brown


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Rochelle J. Vantrease's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record ("Motion") (Doc. No. 12), filed along with a brief in support (Doc. No. 12-1). Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Response (Doc. No. 13), to which Plaintiff filed a Reply (Doc. No. 14). Subsequently, Magistrate Judge Brown issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that the Motion be denied (Doc. No. 15). The Report was filed on October 2, 2012, and it provided a period of fourteen days in which either party could file an objection. (Id. at 14) Neither party has filed an objection to date.

Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs Motion and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.

It is so ORDERED.

____________________________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Vantrease v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Oct 31, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-00042 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Vantrease v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ROCHELLE J. VANTREASE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-00042 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 31, 2012)