From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanni v. Bartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 2005
16 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2003-10815.

March 28, 2005.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kelly, J.), dated October 10, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Before: Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The defendant failed to establish, as a matter of law, that the conduct of the plaintiff's decedent in crossing the street at a location other than an intersection was the sole proximate cause of the accident, and that he was free from negligence in failing to avoid a collision with the plaintiff's decedent ( see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Gecaj v. DiFiglio, 303 AD2d 548, 549; Levy v. Town Bus Corp., 293 AD2d 452; Charles v. Ball, 291 AD2d 367; Ruocco v. Mulhall, 281 AD2d 406, 407; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1146, 1152 [a]). Since the defendant failed to meet its burden of proof, we need not address the sufficiency of the plaintiffs' papers in opposition ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853).


Summaries of

Vanni v. Bartman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 2005
16 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Vanni v. Bartman

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT VANNI, JR., et al., Respondents, v. RICHARD BARTMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 2005

Citations

16 A.D.3d 671 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
792 N.Y.S.2d 190

Citing Cases

Rodriguez v. Areloina

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants' separate motion for summary judgment dismissing…

Moran v. Town of Riverhead

That is, the facts necessary to a trier of fact to determine if the emergency doctrine is applicable, and if…