From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vann v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jun 11, 2012
3:11-00525 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 11, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-00525

06-11-2012

BILLY v. VANN, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security.


ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Brown in which he recommends Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record be GRANTED in part and this action be remanded to the Commissioner for proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.

The Court has read and considered the Report and Recommendation and finds the same to be correct in fact and law. It is therefore adopted by this Court. The Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record, Document #9, is hereby GRANTED in part and this cause is REMANDED to the Commissioner for consideration of Plaintiff's literacy and to consider Dr. Elalayli's August 2010 RFC assessment as new and material evidence.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

Thomas A. Wiseman, Jr.

Senior U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Vann v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jun 11, 2012
3:11-00525 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Vann v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BILLY v. VANN, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jun 11, 2012

Citations

3:11-00525 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 11, 2012)