From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanginderen v. Cornell Univ

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2009
357 F. App'x 146 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 08-56020, 09-55053.

Argued and Submitted November 6, 2009.

Filed December 10, 2009.

Kevin Vanginderen, Chula Vista, CA, pro se.

Bert Deixler, Sr., Esquire, Proskauer Rose, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Nelson E.

Roth, Cornell University, Office of University Counsel, Ithaca, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. Nos. 3:07-cv-02045-BTM-JMA, 3:08-cv-00736-BTM-JMA.

Before: BRIGHT, BYBEE, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

The Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9TH CIR. R. 36-3.

In this appeal, Kevin Vanginderen claims errors of law, fact, and in the admission of evidence. We have carefully examined these claims of error and determine that the rulings of the district court did not prejudice Vanginderen.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM. No costs are allowed on appeal.


Summaries of

Vanginderen v. Cornell Univ

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 10, 2009
357 F. App'x 146 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Vanginderen v. Cornell Univ

Case Details

Full title:Kevin VANGINDEREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORNELL UNIVERSITY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 2009

Citations

357 F. App'x 146 (9th Cir. 2009)