From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vangel v. Szopko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 30, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 11-10549 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NUMBER: 11-10549

04-30-2012

FATIMA VANGEL, Plaintiff, v. DEARBORN HEIGHTS POLICE OFFICERS NICHOLAS SZOPKO, AARON FRANCKOWIAK, TIMOTHY WALSH, CORPORAL R. SMITH, JOANNE BEEDLE-PEER, POLICE CHIEF LEE GAVEN, and CITY OF DEARBORN HEIGHTS Defendant.


HONORABLE VICTORIA A. ROBERTS


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On April 2, 2012 Plaintiff Fatima Vangel filed a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. # 39). She asks that the Court dismiss her claims without prejudice so that she may gather resources, retain counsel and then re-file. She also asks that the Court decline to award costs to Defendants.

On April 9, 2012, Defendants responded to Plaintiff's Motion. (Doc. # 40). They request that the Court deny the motion and dismiss the action with prejudice. If the court dismisses without prejudice, Defendants ask that it do so with these conditions:

(a) Should Plaintiff re-file this litigation, Defendants' Request for Admissions dated November 21, 2011, shall be deemed admitted in any subsequent action filed by Plaintiff arising out of these events and occurrences.
(b) Should Plaintiff re-file this litigation, Plaintiff must pay Defendants' costs of the previous action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(d)(1).
(c) Should Plaintiff re-file this litigation, all of the discovery conducted
to date including Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents and depositions to witnesses shall retain its full effect and may be used for any purposes permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Evidence as if these discovery materials were compiled in that litigation.
(Id. at 3).

The Court finds these terms reasonable and just. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED with these three conditions in place. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Re: Failure to Attend Deposition (Doc. # 35) is DENIED AS MOOT. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS ORDERED.

____________________________

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record and Fatima Vangel by electronic means or U.S. Mail on April 30, 2012.

Carol A. Pinegar

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Vangel v. Szopko

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 30, 2012
CASE NUMBER: 11-10549 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Vangel v. Szopko

Case Details

Full title:FATIMA VANGEL, Plaintiff, v. DEARBORN HEIGHTS POLICE OFFICERS NICHOLAS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 30, 2012

Citations

CASE NUMBER: 11-10549 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 30, 2012)