From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vandever v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 4, 2012
53 A.3d 999 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-10-4

Frank VANDEVER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.


Frank Vandever, pro se, in support of the petition.

The petitioner Frank Vandever's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 135 Conn.App. 735, 42 A.3d 494, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude, contrary to the rule of Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995), and Wilkinson v. Austin, 545 U.S. 209, 125 S.Ct. 2384, 162 L.Ed.2d 174 (2005), that the petitioner had no liberty interest in avoiding administrative segregation?”


Summaries of

Vandever v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 4, 2012
53 A.3d 999 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

Vandever v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Frank VANDEVER v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 4, 2012

Citations

53 A.3d 999 (Conn. 2012)
307 Conn. 909

Citing Cases

Vandever v. Commissioner of Corr.

” We granted the petitioner's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following question: “Did…