From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanderwood v. Huston

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 20, 2024
5:20-cv-02064-KK (PD) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)

Opinion

5:20-cv-02064-KK (PD)

02-20-2024

MICHAEL LAMAR VANDERWOOD, Petitioner, v. MONA D. HUSTON, Acting Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE KENLY KIYA KATO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has also reviewed the objections filed by Petitioner on January 26, 2024. (Docket No. 48). The Court then engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which carefully analyzed each of Petitioner's claims and rejected them. (Report & Recommendation at 7-56).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Vanderwood v. Huston

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 20, 2024
5:20-cv-02064-KK (PD) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Vanderwood v. Huston

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LAMAR VANDERWOOD, Petitioner, v. MONA D. HUSTON, Acting Warden…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 20, 2024

Citations

5:20-cv-02064-KK (PD) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 20, 2024)