From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vancil v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jul 25, 2000
22 S.W.3d 787 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. ED76931.

FILED: July 25, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Honorable Joan M. Burger, Judge.

Douglas R. Hoff, 1221 Locust Street, Suite 350, St. Louis, MO 63103, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon Catherine Chatman, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before Clifford H. Ahrens, P.J., William H. Crandall, Jr., J., and James R. Dowd, J.



ORDER


Movant, Donald Vancil, appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Vancil v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Jul 25, 2000
22 S.W.3d 787 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Vancil v. State

Case Details

Full title:DONALD VANCIL, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Jul 25, 2000

Citations

22 S.W.3d 787 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000)