Vance v. Wong

Full title: DAVID ANDRE VANCE, Petitioner, v. R. WONG, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Jun 25, 2010

EDCV 04-1515 GAF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2010)

Opinion

DAVID ANDRE VANCE, Petitioner, v. R. WONG, WARDEN, Respondent. No. EDCV 04-1515 GAF (FFM). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. June 25, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GARY A. FEESS, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that Grounds 1 through 6 of the First Amended Petition are dismissed with prejudice. Respondent is ordered to file an answer to Ground Seven within 30 days of the date of this order.