From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanatta v. the Philad Company

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 1940
109 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1940)

Opinion

No. 9394.

February 23, 1940.

Appeal and cross-appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge.

Lyon Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, and R.E. Caughey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for Philad Co.

John Flam, of Los Angeles, Cal., for Willis N. Vanatta.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.


Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal, D.C., 28 F. Supp. 539, and cross-appeal herein dismissed, each party bearing his own costs of appeal, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Vanatta v. the Philad Company

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 1940
109 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1940)
Case details for

Vanatta v. the Philad Company

Case Details

Full title:Willis N. VANATTA, Trading Under the firm name and style of Vanatta…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 1940

Citations

109 F.2d 1022 (9th Cir. 1940)