From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Winkle v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 26, 2012
No.3:11-cv-01017 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 26, 2012)

Opinion

No.3:11-cv-01017

11-26-2012

WILLIAM VAN WINKLE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge Knowles


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff William Van Winkle's Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record ("Motion") (Doc. No. 12), filed with an attached Brief in Support (Doc. No. 12-1). Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Response in Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 17), to which Plaintiff filed a Reply (Doc. No. 18). Subsequently, Magistrate Judge Knowles issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that Plaintiff's Motion be denied and this action be dismissed. (Doc. No. 20.) The Report was filed on October 12, 2012, and neither party has raised any objections to date.

Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion. This Order terminates this Court's jurisdiction over this action, and the case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.

It is so ORDERED.

________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Van Winkle v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Nov 26, 2012
No.3:11-cv-01017 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Van Winkle v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM VAN WINKLE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 26, 2012

Citations

No.3:11-cv-01017 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 26, 2012)