Van v. Unifund CCR, LLC.

Full title: Quoc VAN, Petitioner, v. UNIFUND CCR, LLC., Respondent.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jan 16, 2015

154 So. 3d 522 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 5D14–4232.

01-16-2015

Quoc VAN, Petitioner, v. UNIFUND CCR, LLC., Respondent.

Quoc Van, Sanford, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Quoc Van, Sanford, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner challenges the denial of his verified motion to disqualify the trial judge. We conclude that the motion was legally sufficient¹ and, accordingly, grant the writ of prohibition. See Barnett v. Barnett, 727 So.2d 311, 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (“While it is well-settled that a judge may form mental impressions and opinions during the course of hearing evidence, he or she may not prejudge the case.”).

1 In determining the legal sufficiency of the motion, we must presume the facts alleged to be true. Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(f).

WRIT GRANTED.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.