From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Huskey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Mar 10, 1998
966 S.W.2d 312 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 71724

Opinion Filed: March 10, 1998 Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied May 7, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Gary P. Kramer, Judge.

David C. Hemingway, St. Louis, for moveant-appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gregory L. Barnes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and Paul J. Simon and Mary K. Hoff, JJ.



ORDER


Rodney Van Huskey, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after a hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and concluded the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). A published opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b)(2). We have provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only. Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Van Huskey v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Mar 10, 1998
966 S.W.2d 312 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Van Huskey v. State

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY VAN HUSKEY, MOVANT-APPELLANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Mar 10, 1998

Citations

966 S.W.2d 312 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)