From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Gorder v. Van Gorder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 22, 1995
221 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 22, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County (Canfield, J.).


In the stipulation of settlement of their matrimonial action that was subsequently incorporated, but not merged, in the judgment of divorce, defendant agreed to be responsible for all outstanding income tax liens and deliver the appropriate releases to plaintiff. She, in turn, agreed, within 30 days of the receipt of the releases, to pay defendant $15,000 in monthly installments of $160. She further agreed, within 60 days of the receipt of the releases, to pay the balances due on several of the parties' joint credit cards. Defendant delivered the tax releases on May 13, 1994; plaintiff, however, failed to make any of the aforementioned payments. This led defendant to make this application, pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 244, for a money judgment which Supreme Court granted, prompting this appeal by plaintiff.

Inasmuch as Domestic Relations Law § 244 encompasses arrears in any payments that should have been paid pursuant to a judgment or order, Supreme Court did not err in including the balances due on the parties' joint credit card accounts in the judgment ( see, Paul v Paul, 200 A.D.2d 820, lv dismissed 83 N.Y.2d 953; Lauter v Howe, 158 A.D.2d 393, 394). We need not address plaintiff's concern that she will continue to be obligated to the credit card companies if defendant does not pay them in light of his assurance that he is doing so. In any event, plaintiff would not be without remedy if he failed to do so.

We will reduce the judgment by $100 as that sum represents motion costs awarded defendant in a prior order later reversed by this Court ( see, Van Gorder v Van Gorder, 213 A.D.2d 893).

Mercure, J.P., Casey, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, without costs, by reducing the judgment to $9,744.60, and, as so modified, affirmed.


Summaries of

Van Gorder v. Van Gorder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 22, 1995
221 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Van Gorder v. Van Gorder

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH H. VAN GORDER, Appellant, v. WAYNE R. VAN GORDER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 22, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 858 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 687

Citing Cases

Hardy v. Hummel

That said, a party may apply to a court for a money judgment when a spouse "defaults in paying any sum of…

Enck v. Enck

Plaintiff's sole argument on appeal is that Supreme Court erred in granting defendant judgment pursuant to…