From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Damme v. Gelber

Court of Appeals of New York.
Oct 22, 2013
999 N.E.2d 545 (N.Y. 2013)

Opinion

2013-10-22

Alexandre VAN DAMME, Respondent, v. Nahum GELBER, Appellant, Arij Gasiunasen Fine Art of Palm Beach, Inc., etc., Defendant. (And a Third–Party Action.)


Reported below, 104 A.D.3d 534, 961 N.Y.S.2d 391.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Judge ABDUS–SALAAM took no part.


Summaries of

Van Damme v. Gelber

Court of Appeals of New York.
Oct 22, 2013
999 N.E.2d 545 (N.Y. 2013)
Case details for

Van Damme v. Gelber

Case Details

Full title:Alexandre VAN DAMME, Respondent, v. Nahum GELBER, Appellant, Arij…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Oct 22, 2013

Citations

999 N.E.2d 545 (N.Y. 2013)
22 N.Y.3d 952
977 N.Y.S.2d 181
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 88920