From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VAN CURA v. SNIEZEK

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 2, 2007
Case No. 3:06 CV 2278 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06 CV 2278.

March 2, 2007


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This action was transferred to the United States Magistrate for a Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate filed his Report and Recommendation on February 13, 2007. No objections have been filed and the Court has reviewed said Report and Recommendation, the findings and recommendations contained therein, and the record in this case. The findings and recommendations of the Magistrate are well taken and there are no legal points which would be arguable on their merits in an appeal of this case. Furthermore, the Court has determined sua sponte that no certificate of probable cause should issue in this case as any appeal would lack substantial merit.

It is therefore,

ORDERED, that the Report and Recommendation be, and hereby is, adopted as the Order of this Court. Respondent's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 8) granted.

FURTHER ORDERED that under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), an appeal of this case should not proceed in forma pauperis as it would not be taken in good faith.

FURTHER ORDERED that a motion for certificate of probable cause under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is hereby denied sua sponte.


Summaries of

VAN CURA v. SNIEZEK

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 2, 2007
Case No. 3:06 CV 2278 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2007)
Case details for

VAN CURA v. SNIEZEK

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD L. VAN CURA, Petitioner v. T. R. SNIEZEK, Warden, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 2, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:06 CV 2278 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 2, 2007)