From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Cleve v. Hauptman

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 18, 1942
127 F.2d 297 (9th Cir. 1942)

Opinion

Nos. 9278, 9279.

March 18, 1942.

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California, Southern Division; A.F. St. Sure, Judge.

Philip S. Ehrlich, Albert A. Axelrod, and Julien R. Bauer, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

Sterling Carr, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Hauptman.

Chickering Gregory, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees Detroit Trust Co. et al.

Sidney M. Ehrman and Albert M. Monaco, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Wells Fargo Bank.

Ira S. Lillick and Allan E. Charles, both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Bondholders' Committee of Northern Redwood Lumber Co.

Before GARRECHT and HANEY, Circuit Judges.


On stipulation of counsel for respective parties, ordered appeal in each of above causes dismissed without costs to any party, that a decree of dismissal be filed in each cause, and mandate of this court in each cause issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Van Cleve v. Hauptman

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 18, 1942
127 F.2d 297 (9th Cir. 1942)
Case details for

Van Cleve v. Hauptman

Case Details

Full title:John A. VAN CLEVE et al., v. Sidney M. HAUPTMAN, Trustee of Northern…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 18, 1942

Citations

127 F.2d 297 (9th Cir. 1942)