From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valles v. Boparal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-1638-AWI-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-1638-AWI-BAM (PC)

01-16-2013

CHRISTOPHER VALLES, Plaintiff, v. BOPARAL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DENIAL

OF PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS


(ECF Nos. 8, 9)

Plaintiff Christopher Valles ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On November 21, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that Plaintiff's request for production of documents from an attorney be DENIED. The findings and recommendations were served Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days after being served with the Findings and Recommendations. No objections were filed.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations issued on November 21, 2012, are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's request for production of documents, filed on November 13, 2012, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Valles v. Boparal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 16, 2013
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-1638-AWI-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Valles v. Boparal

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER VALLES, Plaintiff, v. BOPARAL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 16, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-1638-AWI-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013)