From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valencia v. Westchester Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 7, 2020
19 CIVIL 1699 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 7, 2020)

Opinion

19 CIVIL 1699 (VB)

05-07-2020

FRANK E. VALENCIA, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY; CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC; RAUL ULLOA, Medical Director; ALEXIS GENDELL, M.D., Medical Administrator; JOON PARK, M.D., Physician; JOSEPH K. SPANO, Commissioner; and LEANDRO DIAZ, Deputy Commissioner, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 7, 2020, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Indeed, plaintiff's last communication with the Court came by letter dated August 6, 2019. The Court concludes plaintiff has abandoned this case. Having considered all of the factors set forth in Lucas v. Miles, 84 F.3d 532, 535 (2d Cir. 1996), the case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute or comply with Court orders. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Judgment is entered in Defendants' favor. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purposes of an appeal; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

May 7, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Valencia v. Westchester Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 7, 2020
19 CIVIL 1699 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Valencia v. Westchester Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:FRANK E. VALENCIA, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY; CORRECT CARE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 7, 2020

Citations

19 CIVIL 1699 (VB) (S.D.N.Y. May. 7, 2020)