From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi
Sep 28, 2006
No. 13-06-337-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. 13-06-337-CR

Memorandum Opinion Delivered and Filed September 28, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices YAÑEZ and GARZA.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant, AMADOR M. VALDEZ, attempts to appeal a conviction for theft from person. The trial court has certified that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2). On June 12, 2006, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. On September 11, 2006, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel's response does not establish (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(d); see Tex.R.App.P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.


Summaries of

Valdez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi
Sep 28, 2006
No. 13-06-337-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Valdez v. State

Case Details

Full title:AMADOR M. VALDEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi

Date published: Sep 28, 2006

Citations

No. 13-06-337-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 28, 2006)