From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 17, 2007
CASE NO. 4:06CV2994 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:06CV2994.

December 17, 2007


ORDER


On March 8, 2007, this Court issued an order assigning this case to Magistrate Judge George J. Limbert for general pre-trial supervision (Dkt. # 5). On November 28, 2007, the Magistrate issued an Interim Report and Recommendation, recommending that the Court GRANT the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Dr. Paul Harvey and Dr. Newton Kendig ("Defendants Harvey and Kendig") (Dkt. # 14, 15) and DISMISS Defendants Harvey and Kendig from the above captioned case. (Dkt. # 16).

FED. R. CIV.P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days after service, but Plaintiff has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Plaintiff is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Therefore, the Interim Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Limbert (Dkt. # 16) is hereby ADOPTED. The Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants Harvey and Kendig are GRANTED. (Dkt. # 14, 15).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Valdez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Dec 17, 2007
CASE NO. 4:06CV2994 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2007)
Case details for

Valdez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:JULIO J. VALDEZ, PLAINTIFF, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Dec 17, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. 4:06CV2994 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 17, 2007)