From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdez v. Dominguez-Valdez

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Aug 7, 2019
No. 04-19-00223-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2019)

Opinion

No. 04-19-00223-CV

08-07-2019

Raul VALDEZ, Jr., Appellant v. Carolyn DOMINGUEZ-VALDEZ, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2016CI18141
Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On June 12, 2019, we struck appellant's brief because the brief violated Rules 9 and 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9, 38. We ordered appellant to file an amended brief in compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure by July 12, 2019, or the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not file an amended brief or request an extension of time. Because appellant failed to timely file a brief in this appeal, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Valdez v. Dominguez-Valdez

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Aug 7, 2019
No. 04-19-00223-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2019)
Case details for

Valdez v. Dominguez-Valdez

Case Details

Full title:Raul VALDEZ, Jr., Appellant v. Carolyn DOMINGUEZ-VALDEZ, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Aug 7, 2019

Citations

No. 04-19-00223-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2019)