From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Valdes v. Whataburger

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jun 2, 2016
NO. 14-16-00222-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 2, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 14-16-00222-CV

06-02-2016

OMAR VALDES, Appellant v. WHATABURGER, Appellee


On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2015-57179

ORDER

On May 4, 2016, appellant, who is appearing pro se, filed a timely motion in this court challenging the trial court's April 26, 2016, ruling sustaining a contest to his affidavit of indigence. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(1), (2). When a motion to review the trial court's ruling on indigence is filed, the trial court clerk and the court reporter must prepare, certify, and file the record of the hearing on the contest to the claim of indigence within three days after the motion is filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(3). A supplemental clerk's record was filed May 12, 2016, but no reporter's record of the hearing has been filed.

Under the unambiguous language of Rule 20.1(j), if the appellate court does not deny a motion under Rule 20.1(j) within ten days after the motion is filed, this motion is granted by operation of law. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(4). Even if the trial court clerk and the court reporter prepare, certify, and file the hearing record within three days after the motion is filed, the appellate court has less than a week to review the record and rule on the merits of the motion. If the trial court clerk and the court reporter file the hearing record after this deadline, but within ten days after the filing of the motion, this court has a very short time to rule on the merits. If the trial court clerk and the court reporter do not file the hearing record within ten days after the filing of the motion, as in this case, this court has no ability to review the merits of the motion, and the motion is granted by operation of law regardless of whether the motion has merit. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(4). This new rule places a heavy burden on the trial court clerk and the court reporter to act expeditiously in preparing, certifying, and filing the hearing record. If they fail to do so, then under the applicable procedure, this court has no ability to review the merits of the motion.

More than ten days have passed since the motion was filed and appellant's motion was granted by operation of law. Accordingly, appellant may proceed on appeal without the advance payment of costs.

Therefore, we ORDER the Harris County District Clerk and the official court reporter for the 55th District Court, to prepare, certify, and file the appellate record without the advance payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(k). The record will be due in this court 30 days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Valdes v. Whataburger

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Jun 2, 2016
NO. 14-16-00222-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Valdes v. Whataburger

Case Details

Full title:OMAR VALDES, Appellant v. WHATABURGER, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 2, 2016

Citations

NO. 14-16-00222-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 2, 2016)