From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vais v. Waldbaum, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1995
220 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 30, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs failed to raise a genuine issue of fact regarding whether the defendant had actual or constructive notice of the condition that caused the injured plaintiff to fall. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant (see, Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836; Davis v. Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 205 A.D.2d 730; Kane v. Human Servs. Ctr., 186 A.D.2d 539; Benware v. Big V Supermarkets, 177 A.D.2d 846). Mangano, P.J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vais v. Waldbaum, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1995
220 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Vais v. Waldbaum, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHELE VAIS et al., Appellants, v. WALDBAUM, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 739 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 994