From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vaccaro v. Sparks

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 4, 2011
SACV11-00164 DOC (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)

Opinion

          DAVID E. OUTWATER, STATE BAR NO. 178093, RANDI PINCKES OUTWATER, STATE BAR NO. 182377, CATHLEEN MULLIGAN GOLDEN, STATE BAR NO. 192279, OUTWATER & PINCKES, LLP, Irvine, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Marc B. Vaccaro and Astrid G. VanZon.


          JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFFS AS AGAINST DEFENDANTS

          DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

         JUDGMENT

         Having reviewed and considered the evidence submitted, and having granted plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment, Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Mark B. Vaccaro and Astrid G. VanZon on their Complaint filed on January 28, 2011, as against Defendants 1) David Sparks, an individual; 2) Sparks Realty & Investments, Inc., a California corporation; 3) Wellington Grant, LTD., a Nevada corporation; 4) Cedar I, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company; 5) Cedar II, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company; 6) WG Cal Investments II, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; and 7) Wellington Grant Notes I, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company (collectively herein "Defendants").

         Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants on plaintiffs' following claims for relief:

         (a) Plaintiffs' First Claim for Relief for violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, § 15 U.S.C. 78j(b);

         (b) Plaintiffs' Third and Fourth Claims for Relief for violation of California Corporations Code § 25401;

         (c) Plaintiffs' Fifth Claim for Relief for Breach of Fiduciary Duty;

         (d) Plaintiffs' Sixth Claim for Relief for Fraud; and

         (e) Plaintiffs' Eighth Claim for Relief for Breach of Contract.

         Plaintiffs are awarded damages as against defendants, jointly and severally, as follows:

(1) Compensatory damages in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in the amount of $1, 599, 700;

(2) Punitive damages in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in the amount of $1, 599, 700;

(3) Attorney's fees in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in the amount of $33, 594;

(4) Costs in favor of Plaintiffs and against the Defendant in the amount of $2, 245.29.

         Thus, the Court orders Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants in the total sum of $3, 235, 239.29.

         JUDGMENT IS SO ENTERED.


Summaries of

Vaccaro v. Sparks

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 4, 2011
SACV11-00164 DOC (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Vaccaro v. Sparks

Case Details

Full title:MARC B. VACCARO, a Wisconsin citizen; ASTRID G. VANZON, a Wisconsin…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 4, 2011

Citations

SACV11-00164 DOC (PLAx) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2011)